Print ISSN: 2476-535X, Online ISSN: 2717-2910

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Research Centre, Central India Institute of Medical Sciences, 88/2, Bajaj Nagar, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

2 Meditations, AIDS, Health, Addiction & Nutrition (MAHAN) Trust, C/O Mahatma Gandhi Tribal Hospital, Karmagram, Utavali, Tahsil Dharni, District: Amravati, Maharashtra, India

3 Central India Institute of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) infection in humans is not adequately diagnosed since classical biochemical and cultural tests are both sophisticated and time consuming. However, being intrinsically resistant to Pyrazinamide, the species-specific identification of M. bovis is clinically significant. The present study was performed to determine the prevalence of Zoonotic M. bovis-induced tuberculosis (TB) in the malnourished tribal population of Melghat using a duplex PCR assay targeting the regions of difference (RD) 1 and 4. A prospective cohort study was carried over a period of 2 years from 2011 to 2013 in the Melghat region of Maharashtra, India. A total number of 347 blood samples were collected from participants recruited through camps organized in 10 different villages of Melghat. The samples were then subjected to duplex PCR assay for differential identification of the mycobacterial pathogens viz., M. tuberculosis (M. tb), M. bovis and M. bovis BCG. The duplex PCR assay identified M. bovis in 2.59% (9/347) and M. tb in 17.29% (60/347) of samples. Altogether the 9 M. bovis positive cases had exposure to domesticated animals or consumed raw, unpasteurized milk. This study provided a rapid and cost effective molecular tool for screening of M. bovis in the isolated regions of Melghat.

Keywords


Introduction

India remains one of the major Tuberculosis (TB) endemic countries accounting for 2.0-2.3 million TB cases compared with 9 million cases reported worldwide (Husain et al., 2016). The Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) is consisted of the closely related bacterial sub-species among which Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb) and Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) are the most important pathogens (Alexander et al., 2013). The identification of the closely related members of the MTC has remained a challenging task owing to non-specific clinical presentations and lack of specific diagnostic tests for differentiation in most
diagnostic capacities in high TB endemic regions. The transmission of M. bovis from animals to human is either by inhalation of aerosol from infected animals or through consumption of raw unpasteurized milk (Rodwell et al., 2008; Ameni et al., 2013). Despite being recognized as major zoonotic infections, limited diagnostic studies are available on M. bovis infections in humans in TB endemic countries like India.
Currently available diagnostics tests for identification of M. bovis are based on conventional methods like microbiological features, phenotypic and biochemical tests. However, these tests are slow, unreliable and time consuming. The high degree of variability among these tests warrants the development of molecular biological tools for identification of M. bovis infections (Comer, 1994). Recent comparative genome analysis has provided valuable information on the region of difference (RD) in the chromosome of MTC indicating that specific identification of MTC can be achieved by the detection of these regions (Parsons et al., 2002). The genes in the RD1 belong to the early secreted antigenic target -6 (esat6) gene cluster. ESAT-6 is a potent stimulator of the immune system, and is an antigen recognizer during the early stages of infection. RD1 of M. tb is considered to be the primary attenuating deletion in the related vaccine strain M. bovis BCG (Lewis et al., 2003) and thus can be used for differential diagnosis of M. tb from other sub-species in the MTC. PCR based methods targeting RDs can be easily performed in local clinical set-ups and are cost effective, which is the foremost requirement of the studied region due to its geographical remoteness and isolation from the developed world (Huard et al., 2003).
We had previously reported the prevalence of latent and active TB in Melghat which is a hilly, forested tribal belt in the Maharashtra state of India with a population of nearly 0.3 million people (Bapat et al., 2015; Kashyap et al., 2013). The tribal population of Melghat has poor socioeconomic conditions and lives in close proximity with their livestock. The prevalence of TB among the habitants and their close association with animals suggested the possibility of zoonotic transmission of the disease in this area. Despite the associated risk factors, the epidemiological prevalence of M. bovis in the tribal population has not yet been established.
The present study was conducted with an aim to investigate the prevalence of M. bovis infection in the tribal population of Melghat. This survey also demonstrates the usefulness of duplex PCR assay using RD targets to identify and simultaneously differentiate between M. bovis, M. tb and M. bovis bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) which can be of commercial diagnostic utility in low resource settings in India.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Central India Institute of Medical Sciences (CIIMS), Nagpur and Meditation Addiction Health AIDS Nutrition (MAHAN) Trust, Melghat. The approved study was in accordance with the
Declaration of Helsinki of 1975 (as revised in 2000). Written consents were taken from each participant after detailed oral explanation about the study.
Study Design and Participants A prospective study was conducted from 2011 to 2013 in the Melghat region, Amravati district of Maharashtra. The study participants were mostly tribal and were recruited from different villages of Melghat (Fig 1) with the help of the MAHAN Trust, which provides medical care to the tribal population in the Melghat region.
Detailed information from all participants was acquired through a structured questionnaire. All participants were recruited using specific inclusion criteria which included risk factors like occupational exposure to domesticated animals, type of livestock reared, and duration of exposure with infected animals and consumption of raw, unpasteurized milk or milk products. Baseline characteristics such as age, gender, height, weight, education, occupation and behavioural factors were also recorded. The information regarding presence of infections or illnesses experienced in the past three months along with previous contact with active TB cases was also included in the questionnaires. BCG vaccination status was based on the assessment of BCG scar on the left forearm. We also assessed the Body Mass Index (BMI) values, percentage weight loss, dietary uptake and physical attributes as determinants of malnourishment among the study participants.
Out of the 438 participants enrolled in this study, 43 participants were excluded from the study based on their refusal to give blood. Pregnant women (n =12) and children below the age of 10 years (n = 13) were also excluded. Paired sputum and blood specimens were collected from the remaining 370 participants. Among these, 23 participants who had other bacterial (n=9) or fungal/viral infections (n=14) were also excluded. The remaining 347 participants who matched the inclusion criteria were recruited for the final analysis. Figure 2 presents the inclusion/exclusion criteria adopted for recruitment of the study population.
Culture procedure
Decontaminated sputum specimens (2 ml) were inoculated into BacT/ALERT® MP M. tb process bottles (BioMerieux, France) with 10 ml supplemented Middlebrook 7H9 broth and incubated at 37°C in BacT/ALERT system (BioMerieux, France). All culture specimens were examined twice a week for 6 weeks. The positivity of culture was defined by the growth of mycobacteria in the liquid media.
DNA isolation and quantification
For DNA isolation from peripheral blood, buffy coat was separated by gradient centrifugation using HISTOPAQUE – 1077 (St. Louis, Mo. SIGMA). Six ml of PBS was thoroughly mixed with 2 ml of peripheral blood. The mixture of peripheral blood and PBS (8 ml) was gradually added from the side of the tube to 4 ml of histopaque and centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 min. The buffy coat thus obtained and was transferred to a fresh tube and equal volume of PBS was
added and centrifuged again at 2000 rpm for 10 min. Supernatant obtained was discarded and the pellet was used for DNA isolation by phenol chloroform extraction method as described elsewhere (Deshpande et al., 2007; Manke et al., 2017). DNA concentrations for all samples and strains used in this study were determined with the Quant-iT dsDNA HS assay kit using a Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen).
PCR
For determination to the species level of the mycobacterial pathogens, namely, M. tb, M. bovis and M. bovis BCG, two genetic regions: RD1 and RD4 were selected as the targets for PCR. Primers used in this study are shown in Figure 3A. For RD1 PCR, the reaction mixture contained 10X PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.8 mM dNTPs, 0.3 μM of each primer, 1U of Taq polymerase and 2 μl of sample DNA. PCR reaction was initiated by denaturation for 10 mins at 94°C followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 60°C for 1 min and extension for 1 min at 72°C with a final extension for 10 min at 72°C. The reaction mixture for RD4 PCR contained 10X PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.4 mM dNTPs, 0.2 μM of each primer, 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase and 2 μl of sample DNA. PCR reaction was initiated by denaturation for 90s at 95°C followed by 35 cycles each of denaturation for 30s at 95°C, annealing at 58°C for 1 min and extension at 72°C for 2 min with a final extension for 7 min at 72°C in a thermal cycler (ProFlex PCR system, Applied Biosystems). Primer pairs for RD4 designed by Taylor GM et al (2007) were used as a primer mixture for RD4 PCR and primer pairs for RD1 were designed by Halse et.al (2011). RD4 is a region of difference in the bovine lineage. The use of RD4 flanking primers made sure that the PCR products were formed only if the deletion was present. Figure -3B depicts the position of the primers in the genome sequence.
Duplex PCR
The two target regions were amplified using a duplex PCR. The optimized protocols for RD1 and RD4 PCR assays were combined to reduce cost, time and sample use. The duplex PCR reactions were carried out using a 10X PCR buffer, 1.5 MgCl2, 0.8 mm dNTPs, 0.4 μM of RD1F/R and 0.2 μM of RD4F/R and 1.25U of Taq DNA polymerase. The amplification procedure consisted of initial denaturation at 95°C for 7 min and 35 cycles each of denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 59°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 1 min followed by a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. A positive control, DNA extracted from M. bovis (ATCC BAA-935) culture, and a negative- no template control were included in each run.
Detection limit of the duplex PCR assay
The limit of detection of the duplex PCR assay was determined using ten-fold serial dilutions from 107 fg to 10 fg of DNA (equivalent to 106–10° genome copies) isolated from M. tb (ATCC 25177), M. bovis (ATCC BAA-935) and M. bovis BCG Pasteur (ATCC 35734) reference strains. To assess the specificity, the concentration of
the DNA templates from each reference strain was adjusted to 10 ng/μl and subjected to PCR.
Interpretation of the Results of Duplex PCR
The PCR amplicons were examined on a 2% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light (BioRad, USA). The duplex PCR was considered as positive for M. bovis when bands of both 176 bp and 110 bp were seen; positive for M. tb when band of only 110 bp was seen and positive for M. bovis BCG when band of 176 bp was visualized on the gel (Jabbar A et al,2015) (Fig 4A).
DNA Sequencing Analysis
The PCR products were purified and sequenced by Sanger’s dideoxy chain termination method at the SciGenom Labs, Cochin India. Sequences were verified by BLAST search using the NCBI website.
Results
Analysis of demographic factors
Out of the 438 participants that were enrolled, a total of 347 participants who met the eligibility criteria were included in the study for analysis. Baseline data of study participants is shown in Table 1. Among the 347 participants, 191 (55%) were males and 156 (45%) were females, 210 participants (60%) belonged to the 18-40 years age group while 187 participants (54%) were malnourished. At the time of evaluation, 73 participants (21%) had respiratory symptoms for more than two weeks and had clinical course consistent with active TB (fever, weight loss, chest pain, abdominal pain, suggestive X-ray). Nearly 242 participants (70%) lived in animals sheds. Based on the information from the questionnaires, 280 participants (80%) lived in close contact with their animals and had high exposure to them. Thirty nine Thirty nineThirty nineThirty nine participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with participants (11%) had previous contact with an active TB case. an active TB case. an active TB case. an active TB case. an active TB case. an active TB case. an active TB case. an active TB case. an active TB case. an active TB case. an active TB case. an active TB case. an active TB case. an active TB case. A total of 94 participants (27%) consumed raw, unpasteurized milk. The BCG vaccination status was confirmed only in 110 (32%) participants.
Culture isolation of mycobacteria from sputum samples
Nine percent (32/347) of the sputum samples were found to be culture positive. All samples were further processed for the detection and differentiation of M. tb, M. bovis and M. bovis BCG by the duplex PCR assay.
Detection and identification of M. tb and M. bovis in clinical samples by duplex PCR
DNA isolated from blood samples of 347 participants were subjected to the duplex PCR assay. Determination to the species level of the mycobacterial pathogens was established by molecular size analysis of the duplex PCR products electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel with appropriate controls. The duplex PCR assay identified M. bovis in 2.59% (9/347) samples, M. tb in 17.29% (60/347) samples and M. bovis BCG in 0.58% (2/347) samples (Table 2).
The M. bovis positive cases were investigated individually to determine their degree and level of contact with
domesticated animals (Table 3). Of these, five cases were bacteriologically confirmed with pulmonary TB and the remaining cases had a clinical course suggestive of active TB. Of the 9 cases, 4 were females and 5 were males. Six cases had an animal exposure of more than 10 hrs per day and lived in close proximity at night. Four participants consumed raw milk and 4 had a TB positive family member. The cattle owned by these positive cases were in contact with the wildlife and shared watering points with wild animals. Based on the physical examination by local veterinarians, 12 of the 43 animals (28%) had poor body condition, showed low productivity and were weak and emaciated. Table 4 shows the characteristics of cattle (n=43) owned by the 9 cases detected positive for M. bovis.
Analytical Sensitivity
Ten-fold serial dilutions (in a range of 10 ng, 1 ng, 100 pg, 10 pg, 1 pg, 100 fg, and 10 fg) of DNA from M. bovis, M. tb and M. bovis BCG reference strains were used to assay the analytical sensitivity of the duplex PCR. DNA of the M. bovis and M.tb strains were detected up to 100 fg by duplex PCR, whereas DNA of M. bovis BCG was detected up to 10 fg. The duplex PCR assay showed 100% analytical specificity when tested with DNA of reference strains of the MTC (Fig 4B).
Sequence analysis DNA sequencing analysis of duplex PCR products confirmed that the 176 bp and 110 bp products were identical with the M. bovis RD4 and RD1 regions respectively (Fig 5). Thus, it was concluded that the duplex PCR products of these samples were derived from M. bovis.
Table 1. Characteristics of 347 subjects from Melghat are listed in the table. Percentages in different categories are indicated in parentheses. Group of exposure was determined on the basis of type of activity, duration and conditions of exposure to animals.

Table 2. Summarized results of BACT/Alert culture and molecular analysis for identification and differentiation of Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis), Mycobacterium bovis BCG (M. bovis BCG) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb).

Table 3. Overall characteristics of M. bovis positive cases

Fig. 1. Map of Melghat. Inset shows its geographical location with respect to the state of Maharashtra, in the Indian subcontinent. Map indicates the 10 villages in Melghat where the study participants were recruited from.


Fig. 2. Study design. The figure represents the inclusion/exclusion criteria (indicated in the grey box) adopted for recruitment of the study population.
Table 4. Characteristics of animals owned by M. bovis positive cases. Body condition of animals determined based on physical examination by veterinarian. Animals were classified as having poor body condition if they showed low productivity, were weak, emaciated or diseased

Fig. 3. A: Sequences of primers using RD4 and RD1 regions as targets of duplex PCR. B: Position of the primers in the genome sequence of M. bovis, M. tb, and M. bovis BCG.


Fig. 4. Duplex PCR for detecting and differentiating M. bovis, M. tb, and M. bovis BCG. A) The ethidium bromide-stained (on 2% agarose gel) amplification products of L1: M. bovis, L2: M. bovis BCG and L3: M. tb. The 176 bp and 110 bp products obtained are indicated. B) PCR sensitivity detection limit done using serially diluted positive controls of M. bovis, M. bovis BCG and M. tb. L1: 100 bp molecular ladder, L2-L8: 10 ng/μl to 10 fg/μl of M. bovis positive control (sensitivity up to 100 fg); L9 to L15: 10 ng/μl to 10 fg/μl of M. bovis BCG positive control (sensitivity up to 10 fg); L16-L22: 10 ng/μl to 10 fg/μl of M. tb positive control (sensitivity up to 100

fg).


Fig. 5. A) Multiple sequence alignment of M. bovis RD4 region and PCR products of RD4 PCR in 3 positive Melghat cases (S1, S2, S3). B) Multiple sequence alignment of M. bovis RD1 region and PCR products of RD1 PCR in the same cases (S1, S2, S3). (Multiple sequence alignment done using CLC sequence viewer 6.6.1).
Discussion
The aim of the present study was to report the diagnostic utility of the duplex PCR assay, using RD targets of proven reliability, applicable directly to human clinical samples. The objective was to develop an accurate method for detection and differentiation of M. tb and M. bovis that could substantially reduce the time and cost of diagnosis in low resource settings of Melghat.
Until recently, the tests used for the identification of M. bovis were based on bacterial isolation and biochemical examinations. Still, the culture isolation of M. bovis from clinical samples has low efficiency (Mishra A et al., 2005). Further, TB caused by M. tb in humans is clinically and radiologically identical to TB caused by M. bovis (Shah NP et al., 2006; Grange JM, 2001). These troubles were overcomed by molecular techniques to some extent; however, could not identify the mycobacterial pathogens to the species level. Unlike these targets, the RD targets used in the duplex PCR assay can simultaneously detect and differentiate the closely related sub-species of the MTC, namely, M. tb, M. bovis and the attenuated vaccine strain M. bovis BCG.
In the present study, 32 culture isolates were obtained by the Bactec culture technique out of the 347 samples examined. However the approach was limited in the ability to identify the mycobacterial pathogen to the species level. The duplex PCR assay was thus used to simultaneously identify and differentiate members of the MTC accurately. Results of the duplex PCR indicated 9 M. bovis cases, 60 M. tb and 2 M. bovis BCG cases out of the total 347 participants.
M. bovis is a predominant member of the MTC and can cause TB in a wide range of mammalian hosts including humans, cattle, goats, dogs, deer and ferrets (Kubica T et al., 2003). It is difficult to clinically distinguish between TB caused by M. bovis and M. tb in patients. Nevertheless, M. bovis exhibits an intrinsic resistance to pyrazinamide which is an important first line anti-TB drug. Therefore, recognition of this pathogen would help clinicians to adopt good patient management with regard to the treatment regime. Detailed investigation of the 9 M. bovis positive cases revealed that 6 had an animal exposure for more than 10 hrs per day. The increased risk of infection in these cases relates to not only their poor socioeconomic standards, but also their poor nutritional status. It has been reported that malnutrition, including deficiency of nutrients affects the spread and onset of zoonotic disease in humans (Portillo-Gómez L. and Sosa-Iglesias EG, 2011). These people not only had close contact with the animals while feeding, milking, but also existed in close proximity at night, sometimes even under the same ceiling. Of the 9 participants, 4 consumed raw milk and 4 had a TB positive family member. Consumption of raw milk is often considered as a probable route for transmission of M .bovis from cattle to human (Grange and Yates, 1994). During the interviews, it was recorded that many participants preferred unpasteurized milk over boiled milk due to its richer taste. Another common pattern in these villages is sharing shelter with cattle which leads to close exposure and potential for transmission of pathogens. It was noted that the hamlets/ huts; sometimes employed as animal sheds, were constructed in close propinquity to the homes. Also, provisional huts were established along the farms where the farm workers and animals existed in close proximity at night. According to one of the respondents, they share their room with the newly born calves at night to protect them from wild animals. This could be one of the reasons for transmission of M. bovis from cattle to humans (Firdessa et al., 2012). Though uncommon, human to human transmission of M. bovis can occur, which could be the probable ground for the positivity of Case 3 who had no contact with animals and had no history of ingestion of raw milk (Evans JT et al., 2007). As well, contact with wild animals through water bodies cannot be disregarded in this neighborhood. The study participants lived in rural tribal areas and had poor housing conditions, minimal approach to health care facilities, lacked awareness about the disease and related causes, and had unhygienic
habits. Altogether these factors further promote transmission of pathogens from infected animals to man.
The duplex PCR assay also identified 60 cases with infection due to M. tb. These findings are synonymous with our previous reports where TB prevalence in the region was estimated to be nearly 32%. The PCR results also indicated the presence of M. bovis BCG in 2 cases. Although the incidence of M. bovis BCG in clinical samples is rare, disseminated disease has been reported in immunocompromised hosts. Malnutrition may be one of the likely causes for disseminating BCG infection in these cases. DNA sequencing of duplex products of all samples that gave amplified products equivalent to 176 bp and 110 bp matched the RD4 and RD1 gene sequences of M. bovis respectively. Hence, it was concluded that these individuals were infected with M. bovis. The high specificity and sensitivity (detection limit up to 100 fg of DNA) of the duplex PCR thus illustrates the potential utility of this assay as a reliable diagnostic tool.
This is the first report of the duplex PCR assay for the recognition and simultaneous differentiation of M. tb, M. bovis, and M. bovis BCG in the malnourished tribal population of Melghat. A systematic literature search on the occurrence of zoonotic TB by Müller B et al., 2013 showed that there is lack of data for the WHO region of Southeast Asia, including major cattle producing middle- and low-income countries (e.g., India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Myanmar, and Indonesia). Recorded incidence rates for zoonotic TB in Europe, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand were consistently below 1/100,000 population/year. The incidence rates were unavailable for other countries. In the Indian context, very few studies have demonstrated the incidence of M. bovis in humans; most notably, studies by Shah NP et al., 2006 and Prasad HK et al., 2005 have shown high incidence of M. bovis and M.tb in extra-pulmonary samples of humans and cattle respectively. A similar study by Mittal M et al., 2014 has demonstrated the importance of screening and differential diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in humans and livestock.
In its current format, this duplex PCR can be applied in any minimum-setting laboratory. Despite of being an insightful study, it suffers from the limitation of insufficient data on animal health. It was learned that worshipping of cattle has spiritual significance in this area, therefore; withdrawing blood or doing any tests on their animals was not possible. Nevertheless, we attempted to gather data regarding certain animal health parameters including productivity and body condition through the local vets. In spite of this, the study has limitations regarding the accurate data on health of animals which may have entered in an asymptomatic phase after infection with M. bovis wherein no clinical signs were developed (Phillips CJ et al., 2003).
Conclusions
This study provides a rapid and cost effective molecular tool for screening of M. bovis in the isolated regions of Melghat.
Further investigative studies would assist in clarifying the dynamics of M. bovis transmission and would help in constituting appropriate strategies for prevention of zoonotic TB in neglected regions like Melghat.
Acknowledgement
The authors acknowledge Dr. Dewanand R. Kalorey, Dr. Nitin V. Kurkure and Dr. Sandeep P. Chaudhari for their support. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Shraddha S. Bhullar and Ms. Sharda P. Bhagchandani for their technical assistance. The authors acknowledge the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India for funding this study (Grant No. Zon.15/11/2014-ECD-II).

Husain AA., Daginawala HF., Singh L. and Kashyap RS. (2016). Current perspective in Tuberculosis vaccine development for high TB endemic regions. Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) Journal, 98, pp.149-158.
Alexander KA., Laver PN., Michel AL., Williams M., van Helden PD., Warren RM. and Gey Van Pittius NC. (2010). Novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex pathogen, M. mungi. Emerging Infectious Disease journal, 16(8), pp.1296-9.
Ameni G., Tadesse K., Hailu E., Deresse Y., Medhin G., Aseffa A., Hewinson G., Vordermeier M. and Berg S. (2013). Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis between farmers and cattle in central Ethiopia. PLoS One, 8(10), e76891.
Bapat PR., Husain AA., Daginawala HF., Agrawal NP., Panchbhai MS., Satav AR., Taori GM. and Kashyap RS. (2015). The assessment of cytokines in Quantiferon supernatants for the diagnosis of latent TB infection in a tribal population of Melghat, India. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 8(4), pp. 329-40.
Corner LA. (1994). Post mortem diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle. Veterinary Microbiology, 40(1-2), pp.53-63.
Deshpande PS., Kashyap RS., Ramteke SS., Nagdev KJ., Purohit HJ., Taori GM. and Daginawala HF. (2007). Evaluation of the IS6110 PCR assay for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. Cerebrospinal Fluid Research, 2(4), pp. 10.
Evans JT., Smith EG., Banerjee A., Smith RM., Dale J., Innes JA., Hunt D., Tweddell A., Wood A., Anderson C., Hewinson RG., Smith NH., Hawkey PM. and Sonnenberg P. (2007). Cluster of human tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium bovis: evidence for person-to-person transmission in the UK. The Lancet Journal, 369(9569), pp. 1270-6.
Firdessa R., Tschopp R., Wubete A., Sombo M., Hailu E., Erenso G., Kiros T., Yamuah L., Vordermeier M., Hewinson RG., Young D., Gordon SV., Sahile M., Aseffa A. and Berg S. (2012). High prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in dairy cattle in central
Bapat et al. 15
JZD, 2017 Vol 2 (2), Pages 2-16.
ethiopia: implications for the dairy industry and public health. PLoS One, 7(12), e52851.
Grange JM. (2001). Mycobacterium bovis infection in human beings. Tuberculosis, 81, pp. 71-7.
Grange JM. and Yates MD. (1994). Zoonotic aspects of Mycobacterium bovis infection. Veterinary Microbiology, 40(1-2), pp. 137-51.
Halse TA., Escuyer VE. and Musser KA. (2011). Evaluation of a single-tube multiplex real-time PCR for differentiation of members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 49(7), pp. 2562-7.
Huard RC., Lazzarini LC., Butler WR., van Soolingen D. and Ho JL. (2003). PCR-based method to differentiate the subspecies of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex on the basis of genomic deletions. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 41(4), pp. 1637-50.
Jabbar A., Khan J., Ullah A., Rehman H., Ali I. (2015). Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis from human sputum samples through multiplex PCR. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 8(4), pp.1275-80.
Kashyap RS., Nayak AR., Gaherwar HM., Bhullar SS., Husain AA., Shekhawat SD., Jain RK., Gaikwad SS., Satav AR., Purohit HJ., Taori GM. and Daginawala HF. (2013). Laboratory investigations on the diagnosis of tuberculosis in the malnourished tribal population of melghat, India. PLoS One, 8(9), e74652.
Kubica T., Rüsch-Gerdes S. and Niemann S. (2003). Mycobacterium bovis subsp. caprae caused one-third of human M. bovis-associated tuberculosis cases reported in Germany between 1999 and 2001. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 41, pp. 3070-7.
Lewis KN., Liao R., Guinn KM., Hickey MJ., Smith S., Behr MA. and Sherman DR. (2003). Deletion of RD1 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis mimics bacille Calmette-Guérin attenuation. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 187(1), pp.117-23.
Manke SD., Husain AA., Daginawala HF., Singh LK. and Kashyap RS. (2017). Comparative Diagnostic Utility of IS6110 PCR Assay in CSF and Peripheral Blood Samples of Tuberculous Meningitis Patients: A Pilot Study from Central India. Journal of Clinical Diagnosis Research, 11(4), pp. 13-17.
Mishra A., Singhal A., Chauhan DS., Katoch VM., Srivastava K., Thakral SS., Bharadwaj SS., Sreenivas V. and Prasad HK. (2005). Direct detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis in bovine samples by a novel nested PCR assay: correlation with conventional techniques. Journal of
Bapat et al. 16
JZD, 2017 Vol 2 (2), Pages 2-16.
Clinical Microbiology, 43(11), pp. 5670-8.
Mittal M., Chakravarti S., Sharma V., Sanjeeth BS., Churamani CP. and Kanwar NS. (2014). Evidence of presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in bovine tissue samples by multiplex PCR: possible relevance to reverse zoonosis. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 61(2), pp. 97-104.
Müller B., Dürr S., Alonso S., Hattendorf J., Laisse CJ., Parsons SD., van Helden PD. and Zinsstag J. (2013). Zoonotic Mycobacterium bovis-induced tuberculosis in humans. Emerging Infectious Disease journal, 19(6), pp. 899-908.
Parsons LM., Brosch R., Cole ST., Somoskövi A., Loder A., Bretzel G., Van Soolingen D., Hale YM. and Salfinger M. (2002). Rapid and simple approach for identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates by PCR-based genomic deletion analysis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 40 (7), pp. 2339-45.
Phillips CJ., Foster CR., Morris PA. and Teverson R. (2003). The transmission of Mycobacterium bovis infection to cattle. Research in Veterinary Science, 74 (1), pp. 1-15.
Portillo-Gómez L. and Sosa-Iglesias EG. (2011). Molecular identification of Mycobacterium bovis and the importance of zoonotic tuberculosis in Mexican patients. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 15, pp. 1409-14.
Prasad HK., Singhal A., Mishra A., Shah NP., Katoch VM., Thakral SS., Singh DV., Chumber S., Bal S., Aggarwal S., Padma MV., Kumar S., Singh MK. and Acharya SK. (2005). Bovine tuberculosis in India: potential basis for zoonosis. Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) Journal, 85(5-6), pp. 421-8.
Rodwell TC., Moore M., Moser KS., Brodine SK. and Strathdee SA. (2008). Tuberculosis from Mycobacterium bovis in binational communities, United States. Emerging Infectious Disease journal, 14(6), pp. 909-16.
Shah NP., Singhal A., Jain A., Kumar P., Uppal SS., Srivatsava MV. and Prasad HK. (2006). Occurrence of overlooked zoonotic tuberculosis: detection of Mycobacterium bovis in human cerebrospinal fluid. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 44(4), pp. 1352-8.
Taylor GM., Worth DR., Palmer S., Jahans K. and Hewinson RG. (2007). Rapid detection of Mycobacterium bovis DNA in cattle lymph nodes with visible lesions using PCR. BMC Veterinary Research, 3, pp. 1.