Document Type : Original Article
Authors
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Shab.C., Islamic Azad University, Shabestar, Iran
Abstract
Campylobacter species are the main cause of infectious gastroenteritis in human beings. Consumption of poultry meat has been proposed as one of the important sources of campylobacteriosis in human beings. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni) in freshly slaughtered poultry in Tehran using culture and molecular methods. It is a descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional study. Fifty samples of whole fresh poultry were randomly collected from supply centres in Tehran from January to February 2024. The standard method of enrichment and cultivation in modified Charcoal Cefoperazone Deoxycholate agar (mCCD) was used to identify Campylobacter spp. DNA was extracted from the confirmed colonies using a commercial kit. Then the real-time PCR method by amplification of the specific region of C. jejuni (ORF-C) was used to determine the C. jejuni. Out of 50 examined samples, 19 samples (38%) showed positive Campylobacter spp. cultures. The results of the Molecular tests showed that C. jejuni was isolated from 13 samples (26%). The results indicated Campylobacter contamination in poultry carcasses in Tehran. Quality control must be improved to reduce contamination in slaughterhouses.
Keywords
Main Subjects
Introduction
Food-borne diseases are one of the most serious public health problems worldwide (1). Poultry meat is one of the most consumed animal protein sources in many countries, including Iran (2). Various bacterial pathogens are transmitted to consumers through meat and poultry products, including Salmonella, Escherichia coli, Listeria and Campylobacter (3, 4). Campylobacter is the most common cause of gastroenteritis in human beings in many developing and developed countries (5, 6).
The members of the genus Campylobacter, which belong to the family Campylobacteraceae, are Gram-negative, rod-shaped, curved, narrow, spiral-shaped, motile and mostly microaerophilic bacteria. Two species of Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni) and Campylobacter coli (C. coli) are the most important disease-causing species in human beings isolated from poultry carcasses (5). Studies have shown that 95 % of human cases of campylobacteriosis are caused by C. jejuni, 4 % by C. coli and the remaining 1 % by other species (7). This disease is a zoonosis transmitted from animals such as cattle, sheep, pigs and poultry to human beings via the faecal-oral route. This infection can occur as mild and self-limiting diarrhoea up to bloody diarrhoea (8).
Although in most cases campylobacteriosis occurs as self-limiting enteritis without the need for antibiotic treatment, severe campylobacteriosis, especially in patients with a weak immune system, can lead to long-term enteritis and septicaemia (9).
Although Campylobacter is not considered a pathogenic agent for poultry and Campylobacter infections in poultry do not usually cause clinical symptoms, the consumption of undercooked poultry meat and poultry products is the most important source of infection for human beings (10). Contamination of chicken carcasses during slaughter, handling and transportation also increases the incidence of campylobacteriosis. One of the main reasons for the contamination of chicken carcasses with Campylobacter is the high presence of this bacterium in the intestines of poultry that have reached slaughter age, leading to contamination of the carcass during the slaughter process (11, 12). Some reports estimate that 20 to 40 percent of individual Campylobacter infections are caused by eating poultry meat. In the United States, it is reported that 80% of Campylobacter infections are foodborne (13).
According to the studies mentioned, the possibility of contamination of broilers with this bacterium is high, and there is also a risk of contamination by human beings. To control contamination, it is therefore necessary to check for the presence of these pathogens, to know the risk factors that cause contamination and to control them. In addition to the points mentioned above, hygiene in slaughterhouses should also be considered for control purposes. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence of C. jejuni in freshly slaughtered chickens in Tehran using culture and molecular methods (real-time PCR).
Materials and Methods
Sample collection
This study is descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional. Using the sample size calculation formula and assuming a precision of 14% and a confidence level of 95%, the minimum required sample size was calculated as 50 samples. Tehran, as the capital of Iran with a large population and diverse food sources, presents a high-risk environment for studying campylobacteriosis, particularly because of its numerous poultry markets and slaughterhouses that facilitate comprehensive sampling for assessing Campylobacter contamination. Fifty samples of whole fresh poultry were randomly collected from supply centres in Tehran from January to February 2024. Samples were collected from five different slaughterhouses (10 samples each) using a simple random sampling method over four weeks. The poultry samples were taken on the day of slaughter, fresh and not frozen, and their production and packaging dates were checked. All samples were transported to the Microbiology Laboratory of Islamic Azad University, Shabestar Branch, Iran, as quickly as possible under aseptic conditions by using insulated containers and ice packs at a temperature of 0 to 4ºC and tested immediately.
Preparation of the samples
According to Instruction No. 17219 of the National Standard of Iran, to obtain samples from fresh poultry, the skin and subcutaneous tissue of the breast area are cut with a sterile scalpel blade and a certain amount is taken.
Isolation and identification of Campylobacter species
Microbiological isolation and biochemical identification of Campylobacter spp
Campylobacter spp. were identified by a culture method according to Instruction No. NRLASD/FQ/P/037 of the Standard Operating Procedure of Iran Veterinary Organization. For this purpose, 10 grams of the sample were added to 90 ml of 0.1% sterile peptone buffer water (Merck, Germany). The mixture was homogenized well and incubated at 41.5 degrees Celsius for 24 hours. Then 0.1 and 0.01 dilutions were prepared and inoculated into two plates of modified Charcoal Cefoperazone Deoxycholate agar medium (mCCD) (Merck, Germany) and incubated again under microaerophilic conditions at 41.5 ⁰C for 44 ± 4 hours. To confirm and separate Campylobacter species, individual grown colonies are analysed using several biochemical tests: Gram staining (identifying Gram-negative, curved or spiral-shaped rods), catalase test (positive in most species except C. sputorum and C. concisus), oxidase test (positive in most species), hippurate hydrolysis test (positive in C. jejuni), and resistance to cephalothin and nalidixic acid (typical for Campylobacter species, particularly C. jejuni) (14).
Molecular detection of Campylobacter jejuni
Extraction of bacterial DNA from the confirmed colonies was performed using the High Pure PCR Template Kit (Roche, Switzerland) and according to the manufacturer's instructions. The primer (15) and probe sequence from Table 2 synthesized by Sinaclon, Iran, was used to amplify the C. jejuni-specific region of the ORF-C sequence.
Real-time PCR was performed using the RealQ Plus 2x Master Mix for Probe Kit (Ampliqon). Table 1 presents the detailed composition of the real-time PCR reaction mix, including the volumes and final concentrations of each component (15).
Amplification and detection were performed using the Rotor-Gene Q (Qiagen). Real-time PCR amplification was performed using the program according to the study by Sails et al. (15). The thermal cycling conditions included an initial step at 50°C for 2 minutes, followed by 95°C for 10 minutes, and 45 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 seconds and annealing/extension at 60°C for 1 minute. For the negative controls, the DNA template was replaced by sterile water. Campylobacter jejuni ATCC33560 was used as a positive control. A positive result was defined as a clear exponential amplification curve above the threshold, as per the standard protocol. Positive and negative controls performed as expected. The primer and probe sequences, as detailed in Table 2, are critical for the specificity of the assay.
Results
Prevalence of contamination in culture and molecular assays
In general, the results of the culture of the samples showed that out of 50 fresh poultry samples, 19 samples (38%; 95% CI: 25–51%) had a positive Campylobacter culture and according to the results of the complementary molecular tests in 19 positive samples, C. jejuni infection was detected in 13 samples (26%; 95% CI: 14–38%) (Figure 1). Figure 2 shows the amplification curve of the real-time PCR.
Discussion
Foodborne diseases are one of the most important health problems in the world. Since Campylobacter as the most common bacterium causing gastroenteritis is associated with the consumption of poultry meat (16, 17), we decided to investigate the prevalence of this bacterium in slaughtered poultry in Tehran using culture and molecular (real-time PCR) methods. The results of the present study show that out of a total of 50 poultry meat samples from Tehran slaughterhouses, 19 samples (38%) were infected with Campylobacter species using the culture method, which is consistent with the reports from other studies around the world and in Iran.
In the Iranian studies, the prevalence of poultry infections with Campylobacter in different cities such as Isfahan, Shahr-e-kord, and Tehran were reported to be 56.1, 47 and 49.5, respectively (18-20). In the study by Fani et al. (21), 31 samples (31%) of 100 carcass samples from an industrial poultry slaughterhouse in the city of Gonabad were infected with Campylobacter. The results of the study by Nasiri and Motalebi (22), showed that 208 samples (37.7%) out of 522 samples of poultry meat and its edible contaminants were infected with Campylobacter species. In the study by Sadeghi et al. (23), out of 100 chicken meat samples collected from 22 districts of Tehran, 35 samples were infected with Campylobacter species. The results of Pourahmadi et al. (24) showed that 217 samples (66.2%) of 328 chicken carcass samples from slaughterhouses in the city of Jahrom were infected with Campylobacter.
In other countries, contamination levels of 30 to 90 percent were reported. In a study of 300 poultry carcasses in Senegal, 168 samples (56%) were found to be infected with Campylobacter (25). In the study by Nobile et al. (26) to investigate the prevalence of Campylobacter species in raw poultry meat samples in southern Italy, 43 samples (20.67%) out of a total of 208 samples were contaminated with Campylobacter. The infection rate was also 49.90% in Ireland and 48% in Pakistan (27, 28). According to the results of various studies, the different levels of contamination can be attributed to the degree of infection of the poultry in the different areas, the time intervals between the studies, the different slaughter methods and the compliance with hygiene principles in the different stages of slaughter.
Since the PCR method is capable of detecting Campylobacter at the species level compared to the culture method (15), we used the real-time PCR method to identify the species C. jejuni in the present study. The results of the molecular assays in our study showed that of the 19 positive samples in the culture method, 13 samples (26%) were associated with C. jejuni and the rest with other Campylobacter species. The results of other studies also showed that the isolation of C. jejuni was far more common than other species, so that in the study by Fani et al. (21) out of 31 positive Campylobacter samples, 19 samples (61.29%) were C. jejuni. The results of the study by Nasiri and Motalebi (22) show that 78.4% of the Campylobacter species isolated from the total samples were C. jejuni. In the study by Raeisi et al. (29), 40.8% of the poultry meat samples were infected with C. jejuni and in the study by Hoseinpour et al. (30), 31% of the poultry meat samples were infected with C. jejuni. Hussain et al. (28) in Pakistan reported a prevalence of C. jejuni in chicken meat samples of 72%. In another similar study by Whyte et al. (27) in Ireland, the prevalence of C. jejuni in chicken meat was reported to be 84.6%.
Other studies have reported higher Campylobacter contamination in summer (4); the winter sampling window in the present study may partly explain the comparatively lower rate observed here.
In general, it can be said that, according to the results of the present study, Campylobacter infections, especially C. jejuni, still occur with different percentages in poultry meat in slaughterhouses in Iran, and it is therefore necessary to carry out continuous testing and to inform consumers to cook poultry fully before consumption to reduce campylobacteriosis. Further, in order to reduce Campylobacter contamination, it is necessary to observe personal and environmental hygiene in slaughterhouses, avoid contact between carcasses and especially with the contents of the digestive tract, use suitable water for correct and complete washing in the slaughter process and apply the principles of hygiene at all stages of slaughter.
Conclusion
The results of the present study showed that out of 50 fresh chicken samples, 19 samples (38%) were infected with all types of Campylobacter species by the culture method and 13 samples (26%) were associated with C. jejuni species by additional testing with the molecular method. This result demonstrates both the efficiency of the molecular method in rapidly identifying the contaminating species and the presence of the risk of Campylobacter contamination in the poultry sold in Tehran, which may call into question the consumption of this product. In order to reduce the contamination of poultry meat and poultry products with Campylobacter species and other similar microorganisms, the principles of environmental and personal hygiene in slaughterhouses must be observed, and regular testing under the highest possible supervision should take place.
Acknowledgments
This paper is derived from the first author's thesis, and we express our sincere gratitude to the Department of Veterinary Medicine at Islamic Azad University, Shabestar Branch, for their invaluable support and access to laboratory facilities that greatly contributed to the research.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Artificial Intelligence Statement
During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used ChatGPT-4 solely for language editing and grammatical correction.
References
- Todd E. Food-Borne Disease Prevention and Risk Assessment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(14):5129. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145129.
- Uzundumlu AS, Dilli M. Estimating chicken meat productions of leader countries for 2019-2025 years. Ciência Rural. 2022;53(2):e20210477. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20210477.
- Farhoumand P, Hassanzadazar H, Soltanpour MS, Aminzare M, Abbasi Z. Prevalence, genotyping and antibiotic resistance of Listeria monocytogenesand Escherichia coli in fresh beef and chicken meats marketed in Zanjan, Iran. Iran J Microbiol. 2020;12(6):537. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v12i6.5028.
- Habib I, Mohamed MYI, Khan M. Current state of Salmonella, Campylobacterand Listeria in the food chain across the Arab countries: a descriptive review. Foods. 2021;10(10):2369. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102369.
- Wilson M, Wilson PJ. Gastroenteritis due to campylobacter. In: Close Encounters of the Microbial Kind: Everything You Need to Know About Common Infections. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 439-450.
- Ryoo E. Causes of acute gastroenteritis in Korean children between 2004 and 2019. Clin Exp Pediatr. 2021;64(6):260. https://doi.org/10.3345/cep.2020.01256.
- Alterkruse SF, Boor KJ, Cook M, Cole E, Freier T, Jaykus L, et al. Analytical Utility of Campylobacter J Food Protect. 2007;70(1):241-50. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-70.1.241.
- Nyati KK, Nyati R. Role of Campylobacter jejuniinfection in the pathogenesis of Guillain-Barré syndrome: An update. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013(1):852195. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/852195.
- Amin SQ, Mahmood HJ, Zorab HK. Campylobacteriosis. One Health Triad. 2023;2:87-93. https://doi.org/10.47278/book.oht/2023.46.
- Kaakoush NO, Castaño-Rodríguez N, Mitchell HM, Man SM. Global epidemiology of Campylobacter Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(3):687-720. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00006-15.
- Rasschaert G, De Zutter L, Herman L, Heyndrickx M. Campylobactercontamination of broilers: the role of transport and slaughterhouse. Int J Food Microbiol. 2020;322:108564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108564.
- Allen VM, Bull SA, Corry JEL, Domingue G, Jørgensen F, Frost JA, et al. Campylobacter contamination of chicken carcasses during processing in relation to flock colonisation. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;113(1):54-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.07.011.
- Taylor EV, Herman KM, Ailes EC, Fitzgerald C, Yoder JS, Mahon BE, et al. Common source outbreaks of Campylobacterinfection in the USA, 1997–2008. Epidemiol Infect. 2011;141(5):987-96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268812001744.
- Bobade S, Vijayarani K, Tirumurugaan KG, Thangavelu A, Vairamuthu S. Morphological, Biochemical and Genotypic Analysis of Zoonotic Campylobacter jejuniIsolated from Chicken Meat Samples. Indian J Anim Res. 2024;58(3):478-83. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJAR.B-4497.
- Sails AD, Fox AJ, Bolton FJ, Wareing DR, Greenway DL. A real-time PCR assay for the detection of Campylobacter jejuniin foods after enrichment culture. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69(3):1383-90. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.3.1383-1390.2003.
- Chukwu CI, Nwalozie R, Nnokam BA, Esiere RK. CampylobacterSpecies: New Insight, Clinical Diagnosis and Laboratory Approach. Int J Pathog Res. 2024;13(1):7-24. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpr/2024/v13i1269.
- Zainol MFA, Safiyanu MB, Abd Aziz S, Omar AR, Chuang KP, Mariatulqabtiah AR. Campylobacteriosis and Control Strategies against Campylobactersin Poultry Farms. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024;34(5):987-93. https://doi.org/10.4014%2Fjmb.2311.11045.
- Rahimi E, Tajbakhsh E. Prevalence of Campylobacterspecies in poultry meat in the Esfahan city, Iran. Bulg J Vet Med. 2008;11(4):257-62.
- Shakerian A, Rokni ND, Sharifzadeh A, Alagha S, Talebian R. Campylobacter jejunias a potential pathogen in liver of broilers chickens in slaughtered & retail market broilers in Shahr-e-Kord, Iran. Iran J Food Sci Technol. 2005;2(1):43-50. https://sid.ir/paper/71515/en.
- Dallal MMS, Doyle MP, Rezadehbashi M, Dabiri H, Sanaei M, Modarresi S, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonellaserotypes, Campylobacter and Yersinia isolated from retail chicken and beef, Tehran, Iran. Food Control. 2010;21(4):388-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.06.001.
- Fani MJ, Mokhtarian DH, Mohsenzadeh M, Ghahramani M, Moshki M. Detection and identification of Campylobacter jejuniand Campylobacter coli from poultry carcasses slaughtered in Gonabad poultry slaughterhouse. Intern Med Today. 2009;15(2):30-5. http://imtj.gmu.ac.ir/article-1-595-en.html.
- Nasiri D, Motalebi A. Investigation of Campylobacter jejunicaused by Guillain-Barré syndrome in poultry meat and edible offal's. J Adv Biomed Sci. 2019;9(3):1675-81. http://jabs.fums.ac.ir/article-1-1703-en.html.
- Sadeghi A, Owlia P, Ganji L, Besharati S, Ahmadi F, Tajeddin E, et al. Investigation of the prevalence of Campylobacterspecies and their antibiotic resistance phenotypes among poultry meat samples in 22 regions of Tehran, Iran. Daneshvar Med. 2020;27(6):1-8.
- Pourahmadi M, Rouhijahromi R, Moradi F, Faraji Z, Far Hang Zargar M, et al. Identification of Campylobacterspecies in Jahrom slaughterhouse chickens in 2016-17. Pars J Med Sci. 2022;17(3):1-6. https://doi.org/10.52547/jmj.17.3.1.
- Cardinale E, Gros-Claude P, David J, Tall F, Cisse M, Guèye EHF, et al. Prevalence of Salmonellaand Campylobacter in retail chicken carcasses in Senegal. Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop. 2003;56(1-2):13-6. https://doi.org/10.19182/remvt.9868.
- Nobile CG, Costantino R, Bianco A, Pileggi C, Pavia M. Prevalence and pattern of antibiotic resistance of Campylobacter in poultry meat in Southern Italy. Food Control. 2013;32(2):715-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.02.011.
- Whyte P, McGill K, Cowley D, Madden RH, Moran L, Scates P, et al. Occurrence of Campylobacterin retail foods in Ireland. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;95(2):111-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.10.018.
- Hussain I, Mahmood MS, Akhtar M, Khan A. Prevalence of Campylobacterspecies in meat, milk and other food commodities in Pakistan. Food Microbiol. 2007;24(3):219-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2006.06.001.
- Raeisi M, Khoshbakht R, Ghaemi EA, Bayani M, Hashemi M, Seyedghasemi NS, et al. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence-associated genes of Campylobacter isolated from raw milk, fish, poultry, and red meat. Microb Drug Resist. 2017;23(7):925-33. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2016.0183.
- Hoseinpour F, Foroughi A, Nomanpour B, Nasab RS. Identification and differentiation of Campylobacterspecies by high-resolution melting curve analysis. Microb Pathog. 2017;108:109-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.05.009.