Print ISSN: 2476-535X, Online ISSN: 2717-2910

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the emergence of staphylococci resistant to heavy metals among methicillin-resistant staphylococcus spp. (MRS) for the first time in Iran. In the present study, in the first step, 300 staphylococcus isolates from humans and domestic animals (cows, horses, dogs, and cats) were studied by disk diffusion method to identify resistance to methicillin. Then among the resistant isolates, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) was confirmed by detecting the nucA gene using PCR. After identifying the MRS and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains, these isolates were phenotypically tested to evaluate the resistance to zinc chloride and cadmium acetate using Muller Hinton agar (MHA) culture medium supplemented with metal. Finally, mecA and czrC genes were examined using the PCR method to evaluate the genotypic resistance to methicillin and heavy metals, respectively. The frequency of phenotypic MRS isolates in the phenotypic evaluation was 51 (17%), and almost half of the MRS isolates (n = 25 or 49%) were confirmed to be MRSA using the S. aureus -specific PCR assay for the mecA gene. Heavy metal susceptibility testing using Mueller Hinton agar plates (Becton Dickinson) supplemented with either zinc chloride or cadmium acetate revealed that 49% and 8% of MRS isolates were resistant to zinc chloride and cadmium acetate, respectively. PCR of the czrC gene showed that only 66.7% of dog MRS isolates phenotypically resistant to these heavy metals harbored the czrC gene. Here, phenotypic resistance to methicillin had a significant relationship with the existence of the mecA gene in all MRS strains. Interestingly, in dog MRS strains the phenotypic resistance to heavy metals had a significant relationship to the harboring of the czrC gene, and also there was a high correlation between mecA and czrC genes. Therefore, the presence of heavy metals (zinc and cadmium) in the living environment of staphylococci makes these bacteria resistant to methicillin.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Introduction

The genus Staphylococcus is Gram-positive cocci and belongs to the family Staphylococcaceae. Although staphylococci are normally commensal bacteria in humans and animals, they can cause a variety of diseases and infections including food poisoning, impetigo, cellulitis, and mastitis (1-5). Penicillin was the choice antibiotic to treat patients with staphylococcal infections, but unfortunately, after a decade, some strains of S. aureus became resistant to penicillin via the production of an enzyme named β-lactamase (PBP2a). Methicillin, a semi-synthetic penicillin, was developed in 1959 and was effective against staphylococcal infections, but later on, some S. aureus isolates became resistant to methicillin and a strain called methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) emerged (1, 6). Other studies in Iran and other countries show that the frequency of MRS is variable and mostly ranges from 21% to 61% (7-10).

Like all living organisms, as a result of selective pressure, antibiotic resistance has emerged to this vital antimicrobial agent (1). One of the main reasons for the resistance of some isolates of staphylococcus spp. to methicillin is the utilization of heavy metals (1, 3, 4, 11-13).  Although heavy metals have many uses in our lives, such as industrial uses, they are toxic, and long-term exposure to them may make bacteria resistant to these metals (14). Researchers have proved that in bacteria; resistance to antibiotics, is strongly and positively correlated with resistance to heavy metals (zinc and cadmium) (3). The simultaneous presence of both antibiotics and heavy metals in the bacterial environment results in co-resistance in bacteria. It is believed that during environmental co-contamination; heavy metals induce antibiotic resistance via the co-localization of genes involved in resistance to heavy metals and antibiotics (1, 4). Co-localization of czrC (gene of resistance to zinc and cadmium) and mecA (gene of resistance to methicillin) on the SCCmec element is a prominent example of this phenomenon (1, 4, 11). The exposure of bacteria to zinc occurs through the utilization of this element as an alimentary supplement or curative agent in animal nourishment, which in turn significantly results in resistance to antibiotics (1, 4).  Studies in other countries show that the frequency rate of resistance to zinc chloride in staphylococci is variable, so zinc resistance (MIC>2mM) was observed in 74% and 42% of European MRSA CC398 from pigs and veal calves respectively, and in 44% of the Canadian isolates, but not among the Chinese isolates (12, 15, 16). 

Cadmium pollutes the environment through agricultural, pharmaceutical, fertilizers, domestic sewage, atmospheric sources, and industrial activities (17). The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of the emerging antibiotic/ heavy metal-resistant bacteria, for the first time in Iran. In this study, by identifying MRS strains isolated from humans and domestic animals that were also resistant to zinc chloride and cadmium acetate, the correlation between resistance to these heavy metals and antibiotic resistance was examined. In addition, by evaluating the presence of genes czrC and mecA in staphylococcus spp. isolates, the correlation between these two genes was also examined.

 

Materials and Methods

Gathering of human and animal Staphylococcal isolates

In the present study, in the first step, human and domestic animal staphylococcal isolates were prepared from the collection of microorganisms in the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad in Khorasan province, northeast of Iran and the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of Tehran University in Iran. The isolates had been previously obtained from bovine mastitis milk, and nasal swabs from healthy humans and healthy domestic animals (horses, dogs, and cats) from 2017 to 2021. The glycerinated stocks were cultured on sheep blood agar (Merck, Germany) at 37 °C and incubated for 48h. A single colony was picked and streaked on mannitol salt agar to check the purity of the colony. Then, morphological characteristics of the bacteria were examined by the Gram-staining and were subjected to catalase and oxidase tests (Microdase modifications) (3, 8).

 Antibiotic susceptibility testing

After collecting 300 isolates of staphylococci from humans (n = 70), cows (n = 100), horses (n = 50), dogs (n = 50), and cats (n = 30), in each isolate, a confirmed colony, sub-cultured on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar (Merck, Germany) for 24 hours and then on MHA (Merck, Germany) for 24 hours to evaluate the phenotypic resistance to methicillin. In this research, antibacterial resistance to the two antibiotics, penicillin (10 µg) and cefoxitin (30 µg) was specified by disk diffusion method using MHA (Merck, Germany) for all bacterial isolates, which were identified as staphylococcus spp. (7, 19).

According to the CLSI guideline, the cefoxitin-disc diffusion method was used to evaluate methicillin resistance in all staphylococcus spp. isolates (7, 20). Following measuring the diameter of growth inhibition zones, the comparison of values was performed to detect MRS isolates using the CLSI standards 2018 (18, 20). After detecting MRS isolates, these colonies were sub-cultured on brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Merck, Germany) for 24 hours and then were preserved at -20 oC by adding 25% sterile glycerol (3, 11).

Molecular detection of nucA, mecA, and czrC

For DNA extraction, the boiling method was utilized. From staphylococcal colonies of a 24-h culture on BHIA media, a filled ring was suspended in 400 μL of sterile distilled water in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube, vortexed, heated up to 100 °C for 15 min and placed in -20 °C for 15 min. Then it was centrifuged at a speed of 8,000 rpm for 5 min and finally 100 µL of supernatant was transferred to a new 0.5 mL Eppendorf tube (0.5 mL microtube) and used immediately (2, 11). Following DNA extraction of phenotypic MRS isolates, DNA templates were utilized in simplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test and observed by electrophoresis technique to distinguish the existence or lack of nucA, mecA, and czrC genes. The amplification of the nucA gene was used for molecular identification of S. aureus isolates (2, 11), and the presence of mecA and czrC genes was examined to evaluate genotypic resistance to methicillin and heavy metals (zinc and cadmium) respectively (11, 16). The primers and PCR program of this reaction are shown in Table 1.

Zinc chloride and cadmium acetate susceptibility testing

Among 300 staphylococcus spp. isolates, MRS isolates were phenotypically tested to evaluate the resistance to heavy metals using Muller-Hinton agar dilution (12, 13, 16). For assessment of heavy metal susceptibility, Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for cadmium acetate and zinc chloride on Mueller-Hinton agar plates with two-fold dilutions of either cadmium (0.125 to 16 mM) or zinc (0.25 to 16 mM) with an adjusted pH of 5.5 and 7.4 for zinc chloride and cadmium acetate respectively (3, 4, 12, 16). The cutoff value to determine resistance was considered the MIC value of ≥4mM (4, 12, 16).

Statistical analysis

In this study, the IBM SPSS, version 26 was used to measure the relationships between data. Additionally, the X2 test (Fischer’s exact test) was used to specify the relationships between the discontinuous variables and after calculating the p-values, the value less than 0.05 was statistically considered as significant. The relationship between phenotypic resistance to methicillin and mecA as antibiotic resistance gene as well as between zinc and cadmium resistance and czrC as heavy metal resistance gene were appraised using Pearson’s correlation test.

 

Results

Antibiotic susceptibility testing

The antibiotic resistance profile of staphylococcus spp. isolates are shown in Table 2. It was found that overall, 177 (59%) of the isolates were resistant to penicillin (10 µg), while 51 (17%) isolates were resistant to cefoxitin (30 µg) that were identified as MRS. All samples that were resistant to cefoxitin were also resistant to penicillin, but some isolates resistant to penicillin were susceptible to cefoxitin. In detail, 13 (18.6%), 27 (27%), 6 (12%), 3 (6%), and 2 (6.7%) of MRS isolates from humans, cattle, horses, dogs, and cats respectively (Table 2). The frequency of MRS isolates among staphylococci isolated from humans and domestic animals is shown in Figure 1.

Molecular identification of S. aureus

All MRS isolates from humans and domestic animals were screened to identify the S. aureus strains using the PCR method for the presence of a specific nucA gene. However, 25 (49%) of MRS isolates were confirmed to be MRSA. In detail, 10 (77%) in humans, 10 (37%) in cattle, 4 (66.7%) in horses, 1 (33.3%) in dogs, and 0 (0%) in cat samples were MRSA isolates (Table 3). PCR amplification of the nucA gene for S. aureus is shown in Figure 2. Unlike cow and dog MRS isolates, most human and horse MRS isolates are MRSA.

Heavy metal susceptibility testing

Among 51 MRS isolates obtained from humans and domestic animals, 49% (n = 25) of isolates were phenotypically resistant to zinc chloride, while 8% (n = 4) were phenotypically resistant to cadmium acetate. Heavy metal susceptibility testing revealed that 74% of cow MRS isolates, 50% of horse MRS isolates and 66.7% of dog MRS isolates were resistant to zinc chloride. Whereas all MRS isolates in humans and cats were susceptible to zinc chloride. Overall, 66.7% of dog MRS isolates and 7.4% of cow MRS isolates were resistant to cadmium acetate but MRS isolates obtained from other groups were susceptible to cadmium acetate. The heavy metal resistance profiles of staphylococcus isolates in humans and domestic animals (cattle, horses, dogs, and cats) are shown separately in Table 4 and Figure 3. As shown in Table 5, the resistance of MRSA strain to heavy metals is greater than other MRS species. In cows, horses, and dogs, most of the MRS isolates that are resistant to heavy metals are MRSA.

Molecular detection of mecA and czrC genes

The mecA-specific PCR demonstrated that 25 of 51 (49%) of total MRS strains were positive for the presence of the mecA gene. In detail, 46.2%, 37%, 66.7%, 100%, and 100% of MRS isolates respectively in humans, cows, horses, dogs, and cats were positive for the presence of the mecA gene (Table 3). PCR amplification of mecA gene for staphylococcus spp. isolates is shown in Figure 4. These results and p-values indicate that phenotypic resistance to methicillin had a significant relationship and a high correlation with the existence of the mecA gene, especially in dogs, cats, and horses (Figure 5). The p-values in humans, cattle, horses, dogs, and cats were less than 0.05 (p < 0.05). As shown in Table 6, the majority of MRS isolates that contain the mecA gene are MRSA, and no other staphylococcus spp. Most of the staphylococci containing mecA are MRSA

PCR of the czrC gene showed that all isolates obtained from cattle and horses that were phenotypically resistant to zinc chloride were negative for the presence of the czrC gene but 66.7% of dog isolates that were phenotypically resistant to heavy metals had the czrC gene (Table 4).

PCR amplification of czrC gene for staphylococcus spp. isolates is shown in Figure 6. These results indicate that all staphylococcus isolates in humans and cats neither were resistant to heavy metals nor had the czrC gene. But some staphylococcus spp. isolates in cattle and horses that are phenotypically resistant to heavy metals lack the czrC gene, so phenotypic resistance to heavy metals does not correlate with the existence of the czrC gene. The results in dog MRS isolates indicate that phenotypic resistance to heavy metals has a significant relationship with the existence of the czrC gene (Table 4), and there is a high correlation between mecA and czrC genes. In dog isolates, the p-value is 0.001 and Pearson’s correlation is 0.8 (Tables 3 and 4).

Discussion

Staphylococcus is an important pathogen with a zoonotic potential that causes a variety of diseases (11). The WHO has reported that the treatment of many infections is difficult or sometimes impossible and this is due to the irregular utilization and injudicious consumption of antibiotics (11, 21). Similar to bacterial contact with antibiotics, the contact of bacteria with heavy metals leads to resistance (11, 20). The co-existence of antibiotic and heavy metal-resistance genes, such as mecA and czrC in the staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCC) element results in resistance to antibiotics via the co-selection phenomenon (11, 22, 23). In this study, as shown in Table 3, there was a significant relationship between phenotypic resistance to methicillin and the existence of mecA gene in all MRS strains of human and domestic animals especially in MRSA isolates.

Several studies have shown that some staphylococcus spp. isolates that lack the mecA gene are phenotypically resistant to methicillin (9, 11, 24, 25). Similarly, in this research, mecA was not identified in some examined staphylococcus spp. isolates in humans, cows, and horses and this may be a consequence of the presence of other genes such as mecC that have not been investigated in this research (2, 10, 11, 26-29). Studies have demonstrated that livestock animals may be reservoirs of mecC-methicillin resistant staphylococcus spp. (11, 26, 30-32). Although systems such as mecA-mecI-mecRI and blaZ-blaI-blaR1, which produce PBP2a, are the reasons for the emergence of methicillin-resistant strains, however, femA gene expression is essential for the expression of genes involved in methicillin resistance (11, 33, 34). In this study, phenotypic resistance to heavy metals (zinc and cadmium salts) as well as the presence and prevalence rate of czrC gene that is involved in genotypic resistance in staphylococcus spp. were also studied for the first time in Iran.

In this research, unlike the research done in other countries, in addition to the resistance of MRSA against heavy metals (zinc and cadmium), the resistance of other MRS isolates was investigated. Moreover, the studied isolates were humans and domestic animals (cows, horses, dogs, and cats), not pigs.

In some studies, conducted in other countries, a strong correlation was reported in particular clonal lineages like LA-MRSA ST398 (4, 12, 15). The relatedness of this mechanism originates from Danish pigs that extensive utilization of diets containing zinc in weaned pigs as a substitute for antibiotics in the prevention or treatment of enteric infections pursued the forbidding of antibiotics for maturation advancement in 2000, nearly a decennium before LA-MRSA ST398 became greatly widespread in these pigs (4, 12, 16, 18). There is a documentary relation between the existence of czrC and mecA genes (4, 15). The physical connection of the mecA gene with the czrC gene is of special prominence because it perpetuates methicillin resistance through the phenomenon of co-selection when using zinc-containing diets in pigs (4, 13, 15). Like studies in other countries, in this investigation, as shown in Table 4, the prevalence of czrC gene was high in dog MRS isolates (66.7%), but it was not present in other (human, cow, horse, and cat) isolates. Based on the chi-square and two-sided Pearson’s correlation tests, there was a significant relationship (p = 0.001) between phenotypic resistance to heavy metals (zinc and cadmium) and the existence of czrC gene in dog MRS strains. Meanwhile, the mecA gene had a high correlation (C = 0.8) with czrC gene in dog MRS strains (Tables 3 and 4).

But on the other hand, in human, cow, horse, and cat MRS strains, there wasn’t any significant relationship between phenotypic resistance to heavy metals (zinc and cadmium) and the existence of czrC gene and there wasn’t any correlation between the mecA and czrC genes. Despite the absence of the czrC gene, phenotypic resistance to zinc chloride has been observed and this could be due to another mechanism for the resistance against zinc (4, 12, 15). It is believed that negative isolates for the czrC gene may contain a kind IVa instead of the SCCmec element.

 In future studies, isolates that are phenotypically resistant to zinc and cadmium and lack the czrC gene should be screened for other genetic mechanisms of zinc and cadmium resistance. However, because of the presence of czrC gene, pathogenic bacteria are also a major threat to public health due to their mechanisms of resistance to antibiotics and heavy metals. Although it was assumed that farm animals could harbor heavy metal resistance genes, in the present work they were only detected in dog MRS. It is of particular interest as companion animals are in close contact to humans. The underlying reasons need further research in the future. Generally, heavy metals should therefore be rationally used as therapeutic agents in animal feed, and heavy metal contamination and the use of antibiotics should be managed in the environment, for example, phosphorus fertilizers should be used rationally in agriculture.

 

Abbreviations

MRS: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococci

MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

PCR: Polymerase chain reaction

PBP2a: Penicillin binding protein2a

  1. aureus: Staphylococcus aureus
  2. intermedius: Staphylococcus intermedius

MHA: Mueller Hinton agar

BHI: Brain heart infusion

 

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ferdowsi University of Mashhad for providing the research grant and facilities for conducting this research (Grant No. FUM. 50992)

Conflict of interests

There are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All stages of the present work has been conducted according to the research ethics guidelines of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad and Ministry of Science.

  1. References

    1. Dweba CC, Zishiri OT, El Zowalaty ME. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: livestock-associated, antimicrobial, and heavy metal resistance. Infect Drug Resist. 2018; 11: 2497-2509. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S175967.
    2. Pekana A, Green E. Antimicrobial resistance profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from meat carcasses and bovine milk in abattoirs and dairy farms of the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(10):2223. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102223.
    3. Hanif E, Hassan SA. Heavy metal resistance and antibiotic resistance in hospital isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from Karachi. FUUAST J Biol. 2016; 6(1):11-6.
    4. Main R. Prevalence of zinc resistance encoded by the czrC gene in US swine-associated MRSA ST5 strains. National Animal Disease Center/ ARS/ USDA .2016. NPB 15-145.
    5. Weese JS, van Duijkeren E. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in veterinary medicine. Vet Microbiol. 2010; 140(3-4):418-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.01.039.
    6. Oliveira D, Borges A, Simões M. Staphylococcus aureus toxins and their molecular activity in infectious diseases. Toxins. 2018; 10(6):252. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10060252.
    7. Beyene T, Hayishe H, Gizaw F, Beyi AF, Abunna F, Mammo B, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Staphylococcus in dairy farms, abattoir and humans in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2017; 10(1):171. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s13104-017-2487-y
    8. Olowo-Okere A, Atata RF, Abass A, Shuaibu AS, Yahya UH, Tanko N. Incidence and Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Wounds of Patients at Specialist Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria. J Med Bacteriol. 2017; 6(3-4):44-50.
    9. Elhassan MM, Ozbak HA, Hemeg HA, Elmekki MA, Ahmed LM. Absence of the mecA gene in methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from different clinical specimens in Shendi City, Sudan. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/895860.
    10. Khairalla AS, Wasfi R, Ashour HM. Carriage frequency, phenotypic, and genotypic characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from dental health-care personnel, patients, and environment. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07713-8
    11. Dweba CC, Zishiri OT, El Zowalaty ME. Isolation and molecular identification of virulence, antimicrobial and heavy metal resistance genes in livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pathogens. 2019; 8(2):79. https://doi.org/103390/pathogens8020079.
    12. Cavaco LM, Hasman H, Stegger M, Andersen PS, Skov R, Fluit AC, et al. Cloning and occurrence of czrC, a gene conferring cadmium and zinc resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010; 54(9):3605-8. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00058-10.
    13. Slifierz MJ, Friendship RM, Weese JS. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in commercial swine herds is associated with disinfectant and zinc usage. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015; 81(8):2690-5. https://doi.org/ 10.1128/AEM.00036-15
    14. Jaishankar M, Tseten T, Anbalagan N, Mathew BB, Beeregowda KN. Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip Toxicol.2014;7(2):60. https://doi.org/10.2478/intox-2014-0009.
    15. Cavaco LM, Hasman H, Aarestrup FM, Wagenaar JA, Graveland H, Veldman K, et al. Zinc resistance of Staphylococcus aureus of animal origin is strongly associated with methicillin resistance. Vet Microbiol. 2011; 150(3-4):344-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.02.014.
    16. 16. Hau SJ, Frana T, Sun J, Davies PR, Nicholson TL. Zinc Resistance within Swine-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in the United States is Associated with Multilocus sequence Type Lineage. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017; 83(15):e00756-17. https://doi.org/1128/AEM.00756-17.
    17. Tchounwou PB, Yedjou CG, Patlolla AK, Sutton DJ. Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. Exp Suppl. 2012; 133-64. https://doi.org/101007/978-3-7643-8340-4_6.
    18. Aarestrup FM, Cavaco L, Hasman H. Decreased susceptibility to zinc chloride is associated with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 in Danish swine. Vet Microbiol. 2010; 142: 455–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.10.021.
    19. Asanin J, Misic D, Aksentijevic K, Tambur Z, Rakonjac B, Kovacevic I, et al. Genetic profiling and comparison of human and animal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from Serbia. Antibiotics (Basel). 2019; 8(1):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8010026
    20. Adekanmbi AO, Falodun OI. Heavy metals and antibiotics susceptibility profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from several points receiving daily input from the Bodija abattoir in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Adv Microbiol. 2015; 5(13):871-880. https://doi.org/ 10.4236/aim.2015.513091.
    21. Pires D, de Kraker ME, Tartari E, Abbas M, Pittet D. ‘Fight antibiotic resistance—It’s in your hands’: call from the World Health Organization for 5th may 2017. Clin Infec Dis. 2017; 64(12):1780-3. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix226.
    22. Xue H, Wu Z, Li L, Li F, Wang Y, Zhao X. Coexistence of heavy metal and antibiotic resistance within a novel composite staphylococcal cassette chromosome in a Staphylococcus haemolyticus isolate from bovine mastitis milk. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015; 59(9):5788-92. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.04831-14.
    23. Wales AD, Davies RH. Co-selection of resistance to antibiotics, biocides and heavy metals, and its relevance to foodborne pathogens. Antibiotics (Basel). 2015; 4(4):567-604. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/antibiotics4040567.
    24. Antonios Z, Theofilos P, Ioannis M, Georgios S, Georgios V, Evridiki B, et al. Prevalence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bulk tank milk from Greek traditional ovine farms. Small Rumin Res. 2015; 125:120-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2015.02.009.
    25. García-Álvarez L, Holden MT, Lindsay H, Webb CR, Brown DF, Curran MD, et al. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a novel mecA homologue in human and bovine populations in the UK and Denmark: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis.2011;11(8):595-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(11)70126-8
    26. Klibi A, Maaroufi A, Torres C, Jouini A. Detection and characterization of methicillin-resistant and susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci in milk from cows with clinical mastitis in Tunisia. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;52(6):930-5.

    https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.07.026.

    1. Lozano C, Gharsa H, Ben Slama K, Zarazaga M, Torres C. Staphylococcus aureus in animals and food: methicillin resistance, prevalence and population structure. A review in the African continent. Microorganisms. 2016;4(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms4010012.
    2. Abdulgader SM, Shittu AO, Nicol MP, Kaba M. Molecular epidemiology of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Africa: A systematic review. Front Microbiol. 2015; 6:348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00348.
    3. Singh-Moodley A, Marais E, Perovic O. Discrepancies in the identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and the absence of mecC in surveillance isolates in South Africa. S Afr J Infect Dis. 2015; 30(4):122-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/23120053.2015.1107256.
    4. Haenni M, Châtre P, Dupieux C, Métayer V, Maillard K, Bes M, et al. mecC-positive MRSA in horses. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015; 70(12):3401-2. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkv278.
    5. Paterson GK, Harrison EM, Holmes MA. The emergence of mecC methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol. 2014; 22(1):42-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2013.11.003.
    6. Bortolami A, Verin R, Chantrey J, Corrò M, Ashpole I, Lopez J, Timofte D. Characterization of Livestock-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 and mecC-positive CC130 from Zoo Animals in the United Kingdom. Microb Drug Resist. 2017, 23, 908–914. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2017.0161.
    7. Hao H, Dai M, Wang Y, Huang L, Yuan Z. Key genetic elements and regulation systems in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Future Microbiol. 2012; 7(11):1315-29. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb.12.107.
    8. Li X, Xiong Y, Fan X, Zhong Z, Feng P, Tang H, et al. A study of the regulating gene of femA from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. J Int Med Res. 2008; 36(3):420-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323000803600306.