Print ISSN: 2476-535X, Online ISSN: 2717-2910

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

2 Department of pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Sarcocystis species are intracellular protozoan parasites that cause cysts in the muscles of animals throughout the world. So far, more than 200 Sarcocystis species with different life cycles and pathogenicity have been identified in different hosts, and some of these species have zoonotic importance. Seven species in cattle are known to form macroscopic and microscopic cysts. Of which, S. hominis and S. heydorni, are zoonotic species and S. cruzi is the most pathogenic species in cattle. This study aimed to identify the important species of Sarcocystis in thirty cows slaughtered in Tabriz slaughterhouse by sampling the heart, diaphragm, intercostal and triceps muscles. Although no macroscopic cysts were found, prevalence of microscopic cysts were 86.6%. The results showed 926 bp and 937 bp fragments for Sarcocystis hominis and Sarcocystis cruzi, respectively. The BfaI endonuclease was used to digest the PCR products. According to the PCR-RFLP results, the rate of single infection with S. hominis and S. cruzi was 16.7% and 26.7%, respectively, and co-infection was 43.2 %. S. cruzi was showed ˷ 400bp, 300 bp, and ˷ 237 bp fragments and S. hominis was showed one ˷600bp with two overlapped ˷163 bp (2x).  In the present study, new digestion patterns were observed ‎compared to previously reported in Iran with the same restriction enzyme. These results suggest the presence of heterozygosity in S.cruzi and S.hominis in different regions of Iran.  

Keywords

Main Subjects

Introduction

Sarcocystis sp.  is a cyst-forming coccidial parasite with a two-host life cycle including carnivores as definitive hosts, and herbivores or omnivores as intermediate hosts (1). More than one species of Sarcocystis may exist in every intermediate and definitive host (2). Ultrastructural studies and molecular biology procedures (PCR and sequencing) were used to distinguish and differentiate Sarcocystis species in intermediate hosts (3, 4). Formerly, Sarcocystis were determined by the structure of the cyst wall, which typically originates in the intermediate host's striated muscles. Nowadays, examining of DNA sequences helps to identify Sarcocystis species. Even within the same genus, variable regions of the 18S rRNA gene are compelling targets for identifying and characterizing distinct species (5). So far, it has been found that 18SrRNA sequences show the lowest interspecies homology for Sarcocystis compared to intraspecies comparisons (6-10).

RFLP analysis is a valid and reliable diagnostic tool for Sarcocystis spp.  This method is based on the fragmentation of the nucleic acid obtained from the PCR reaction. To perform the RFLP test, restriction enzymes must be used to digest nucleic acids. After digestion, researchers obtain a precise pattern of nucleic acid fragments. Sequence diversity is defined by comparisons between digestion results. This method is described as a low-cost method, with simple use and excellent measurement sensitivity (10).

So far, seven species of Sarcocystis in cattle have been reported to have different pathogenicity. Sarcocystis cruzi is recognized as the most pathogenic species, that causes abortion, low milk yield, poor body growth, and death in cattle, and S.hominis is the most important zoonotic species from cattle, and transmitted to humans by eating raw or undercooked beef (11). Therefore, this study aimed to detect S.cruzi as important pathogenic species in cattle and S. hominis infection rate as zoonotic species in beef for human consumption in Tabriz, Iran.

 

Material and methods

Sampling

This study was conducted on 30 samples randomly taken from the heart, diaphragm, intercostal and triceps muscles of the slaughtered cattle from the Tabriz slaughterhouse, Iran. All animals in this study appeared healthy before slaughter. To diagnose macroscopic sarcocysts, eye examination was used, and for microscopic cysts, peptic digestion and molecular methods were used.

Peptic digestion method

For the presence of Sarcocystis macrocysts, the sampled muscles were thoroughly examined, and after that, the peptic digestion method was applied as formerly described (12). Briefly, fifty grams of grind muscles were incubated in 100 mL of acid-pepsin for 30 minutes at 37°C as a digestion medium (10ml HCl 37%+2.5 gr pepsin). Then, 200 ml of PBS was added to the solution to inactivate the acid. The digested material was filtered into a tube through a fine mesh filter, centrifuged at 1500 ×g for 10 minutes, and the sediment suspended in 0.5 ml of distilled water. The suspension was then examined under a light microscope at 400× magnification for Sarcocystis bradyzoites. In addition, more drops of the same solution were applied to the glass slides, fixed, and stained with 1% Giemsa stain, and re-examined.

DNA extraction and PCR reaction

Genomic DNA was isolated using the phenol-chloroform technique, then stored at -20 °C. The polymerase chain reaction was performed to amplify the 18S ribosomal RNA gene of S.hominis and S.cruzi using forward primer (5'-CGT GGT AAT TCT ATG GCT AAT ACA-3') and reverse primer (5'-TTT ATG GTT AAG ACT ACG ACG GTA-3') as previously described (10). The expected PCR products were 926 bp for S. hominis and 937 bp for S. cruzi.

The PCR reaction was performed by a 25 µL reaction mix comprising genomic DNA (100 ng), 1µL of each primer (10 µM), 12.5 µL of master mix PCR (Amplicon, Denmark), and distilled water. In a Eurofins thermal cycler, the reaction was carried out (Eurofins, Germany). PCR program set upped as a 5-minute denaturation stage at 94°C was follow out via 30 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 58°C, and 30 seconds at 72°C and a 5-minute final elongation step at 72°C.   

RFLP analysis 

The PCR products were independently digested by BfaI restriction endonuclease (Thermo SCIENTIFIC, Canada) to identify S. cruzi and S. hominis, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, a total volume of 30 μl was prepared from the digestion reaction containing 8 μl of PCR products, 1 µL (1 U) of BfaI restriction enzymes, 3 µL of 10x enzyme buffer, and 18 µL of distilled water. For enzyme activation, reaction tubes were incubated for 16 hours at 37 ° C, then 20 minutes at 65 °C for inactivation. The digested PCR products were simultaneously loaded with a 50-1500 bp DNA ladder (SinaClon, Iran) on a DNA safe-stained 1.2% agarose gel (SinaClon, Iran) and imaged.

 

Results

Macroscopic and Microscopic Results

The presence of microscopic Sarcocysts in cattle was found in 26 out of 30 samples (86.66%) by the digestion method. The bradyzoites of Sarcocystis in beef are illustrated in Figure 1. No macroscopic cysts were observed. 

PCR results

In molecular study, out of 30 samples, 26 samples (86.6%) were positive.  The results of 1.2% gel agarose electrophoresis showed a 926 bp and a 937 bp of PCR products for S. hominis and S. cruzi, respectively (Figure 2). Four samples didn’t have any contamination either in the microscopic or molecular study.

RFLP analysis

The BfaI endonuclease was used to digest 8 µl of PCR products. Digestions were electrophoresed on %2 agarose gels with a voltage of 60 volts (120 minutes). According to the PCR-RFLP results, S. cruzi was offered ˷ 400 bp and ˷ 300bp, and also ˷ 237bp fragments. Also, S. hominis was showed one ˷600bp with two overlapped ˷163 bp fragments (Figures 3, 4).

All positive samples of S. hominis with each other and all positive samples of S. cruzi with each other showed homozygosis in the 18S rRNA gene because two and three restriction enzyme sites were seen in the genes of the two species in all samples, respectively. The rate of single infection with S. hominis and S. cruzi was about 16.7% and 26.7%, respectively, and coinfection was 43.2%. In total, the infection rate of S.cruzi was 69.9% and S. hominis was 59.9%. We found new digestion patterns in comparison to previously reported fragments with the same restriction enzyme in Iran. 

Discussion

In addition to the zoonotic importance of S. hominis, eating beef infected with S. cruzi can also cause digestive symptoms such as nausea and diarrhea in humans. Therefore, this research was conducted to investigate the level of contamination with these species in beef in Tabriz. To characterize S. cruzi and S. hominis in slaughtered cattle, the current study used a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) technique. It showed the distinction between these species, using only a restriction enzyme (BfaI) at 18S rRNA gene.

Many practical tools for the detection and differentiation of Sarcocystis spp. exists and allows scientists to conduct epidemiological research. Morphological assessment of Sarcocystis, especially the structure of the cyst wall and sporocysts is used to distinguish different species, but the available molecular methods are able to identify morphologically similar cysts or belonging to other species in each host (13, 14). The application of PCR-RFLP technique in the routine identification of Sarcocystis species has been proven as a rapid and more cost-effective technique, gives the same result as detailed morphological studies or DNA sequence-based identifications (10, 15).

 RFLP with BfaI in this study showed a different enzyme digestion pattern with previously reported in Iran in slaughtered cattle.  Haji Mohammadi et al. (2014) reported the restriction fragments of 376 bp and 397 bp detected S. hominis and fragments of 184bp, 371bp and 382 bp detected S. cruzi, after RFLP with BfaI in Yazd, Iran (16). Also, Dalir Ghaffari et al. (2022) reported the restriction fragments of 560/70/50 bp detected S. hominis and fragments of 365/195/70/50 bp detected S. cruzi, after RFLP with BfaI in west of Tehran, Iran (17). These results suggest the presence of heterozygosity in S.cruzi and S.hominis in different regions of Iran. As in a recent study in Northwest Iran by Sarafaraz et al. (2020) the heterogeneity analysis of S. cruzi 18S-rRNA sequences has indicated the genetic diversity of S. cruzi isolates including 16 haplotypes (18). The prevalence of S. hominis and S. cruzi in cattle in this study was consistent with previous reports in other countries in that S. cruzi was the most common species, followed by S. hominis (2, 19- 21). Also, this study like previous showed that Sarcocystis infection is very common in cattle in Iran, and the dominant species is S. cruzi (16, 18, 19, 22).  

Conclusion

In the present study, the rate of single infection with S. hominis and S. cruzi was 16.7% and 26.7%, and ‎coinfection, was 43.2 %. BfaI endonuclease could be detected S. cruzi and S. hominis. But, new digestion RFLP patterns were observed ‎compared to ‎previously reported.‎ Finally, it was concluded that RFLP- PCR technique is strong and useful molecular tool can detect heterogenicity in Sarcocystis species successfully.

 

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to University of Tabriz for financial supporting and to Dr. Parviz Hassanzadeh and all of the members of Tabriz slaughterhouse in East Azerbaijan ‎Province, Iran for their assistance in sample collection. ‎

Ethical approval

This study was conducted following the guidelines and standards of the Animal Research Ethics Committee at the University of Tabriz.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest in conducting this research.

 

  1. Fayer R. Sarcocystis in human infections. Clin Microbiol Rev.2004 Oct; 17(4): 894–902. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.17.4.894-902.2004  
  2. Lindsay D S, Dubey J P. Neosporosis, toxoplasmosis, and sarcocystosis in ruminants. Veterinary Clinics: Food Animal Practice 22, 645-671. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2020 Mar; 36(1):205-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2019.11.004
  3. Dubey J P, Speer C, Charleston W. Ultrastructural differentiation between sarcocysts of Sarcocystis hirsuta and Sarcocystis hominis. Vet Parasitol. 1989 Nov; 34(1-2):153-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(89)90177-5

  1. Liu D. Molecular detection of foodborne pathogens. 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC press; 2009. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420076448
  2. Fischer S, Odening K. Characterization of bovine Sarcocystis species by analysis of their 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. J Parasitol. 1998 Feb;84(1):50-4. PMID: 9488337
  3. Neefs J M, Van de Peer Y, De Rijk P, Goris A, De Wachter R. Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Apr 25; 18(Suppl): 2237–2317. https://doi.org/1093/nar/18.suppl.2237
  4. Holmdahl O J, Mattsson J G, Uggla A, Johansson K E. Oligonucleotide probes complementary to variable regions of 18S rRNA from Sarcocystis Mol Cell Probes. 1993 Dec; 7(6):481-6. https://doi.org/ 10.1006/mcpr.1993.1071
  5. Ellis, J., Luton, K., Baverstock, P., Whitworth, G., Tenter, A., Johnson, A. Phylogenetic relationships between Toxoplasma and Sarcocystis deduced from a comparison of 18S rDNA sequences. Parasitology. 1995 Jun; 110 (Pt 5):521-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000065239
  6. Yang Z Q, Zuo Y X, Yao Y G, Chen X W, Yang G C, Zhang Y P. Analysis of the 18S rRNA genes of Sarcocystisspecies suggests that the morphologically similar organisms from cattle and water buffalo should be considered the same species. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2001 Jul; 115(2):283-8.  https://doi.org/1016/s0166-6851(01)00283-3
  7. Yang Z Q, Li Q Q, Zuo Y X, Chen X W, Chen Y J, Nie L, et al. Characterization of Sarcocystis species in domestic animals using a PCR-RFLP analysis of variation in the 18S rRNA gene: a cost-effective and simple technique for routine species identification. Exp Parasitol. 2002 Nov-Dec;102(3-4):212-7. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-4894(03)00033-x
  8. Fayer R. Esposito D H, Dubey J P. Human infections with Sarcocystis Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015 Apr; 28(2): 295–311. https://doi.org/ 10.1128/CMR.00113-14
  9. Dubey J P. Refinement of pepsin digestion method for isolation of Toxoplasma gondii from infected tissues. Vet Parasitol. 1998 Jan 15;74(1):75-7.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(97)00135-0
  10. Motamedi G R, Dalimi A, Nouri A, Aghaeipour K. Ultrastructural and molecular characterization of Sarcocystis isolated from camel (Camelus dromedarius) in Iran. Parasitol Res. 2011 Apr;108(4):949-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-2137-y
  11. Dahlgren S, Gjerde B. Genetic characterization of six Sarcocystis species from reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) in Norway based on the small subunit rRNA gene. Vet Parasitol. 2007 May; 146(3-4):204-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.02.023
  12. Li Q Q, Yang Z Q, Zuo Y X, Attwood S, Chen X W, Zhang Y P. A PCR-based RFLP analysis of Sarcocystis cruzi (Protozoa: Sarcocystidae) in Yunnan Province, PR China, reveals the water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) as a natural intermediate host. J Parasitol. 2002 Dec; 88(6):1259-61. https://doi.org/10.1645/0022-3395(2002)088[1259:APBRAO]2.0.CO;2
  13. Hajimohammadi B, Dehghani A, Ahmadi M M, Eslami G, Oryan A, Khamesipour A. Prevalence and species identification of Sarcocystis in raw hamburgers distributed in Yazd, Iran using PCR-RFLP. Journal of Food Quality and Hazards Control. 2014; 1: 15-20.
  14. Dalir Ghaffari A, Dalimi A, Pirestani , Microscopic and Molecular Detection of Sarcocystis cruzi (Apicomplexa: Sarcocystidae) in the Heart Muscle of Cattle. Iran J Parasitol. 2022; 17 (4): 535-542. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijpa.v17i4.11281
  15. Sarafraz N, Spotin A, Haniloo A, Fazaeli A. Prevalence and molecular analysis of Sarcocystis infections in cattle in Northwest Iran and the first global report of S. gigantea in cattle. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Dec: 73:101566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101566.
  16. Jehle C, Dinkel A, Sander A, Morent M, Romig T, Luc PV, De TV, Thai VV, Mackenstedt U. Diagnosis of Sarcocystis in cattle (Bos taurus) and water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) in Northern Vietnam. Vet Parasitol. 2009 Dec 23;166(3-4):314-20. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.08.024  
  17. Moré G, Abrahamovich P, Jurado S, Bacigalupe D, Marin J, Rambeaud M, et al. Prevalence of Sarcocystis in Argentinean cattle. Vet Parasitol. 2011 Apr 19;177(1-2):162-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.11.036
  18. Chiesa F, Muratore E, Dalmasso A, Civera T. A new molecular approach to assess the occurrence of Sarcocystis in cattle and products thereof: preliminary data. Ital J Food Saf. 2013    November; 2:148–51. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2013.e41
  19. Salehi M, Spotin A, Rostamian M, Adami M. Prevalence and molecular assessment of Sarcocystis infection in livestock in northeast Iran. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Jan: 80:101738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2021.101738.