Print ISSN: 2476-535X, Online ISSN: 2717-2910

Document Type : Original research paper

Authors

1 Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Kütahya Evliya Çelebi Training and Research Hospital, Kütahya, Turkey

2 Department of Infectious Disease and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Canakkale, Turkey

3 Department of Infection Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Antalya, Turkey

Abstract

Human brucellosis causes a variety of clinical symptoms and osteoarticular involvement is the most common involvement. We conducted a bibliometric analysis study on osteoarticular involvement in brucellosis. The study's aim was to investigate the impact of publications in this field and to discover research development and clusters. We used the Web of Science (Wos) database to obtain the data. The titles, document types, publication years, authors, organizations, keywords, abstracts of each record, H-index, and citations were analyzed. We analyzed 642 documents (research articles and review articles). 83.178% of them were published in Science Citation Index Expanded (Sci-Expanded) indexed journals. English (88.785%) was the most preferred language. Researchers from 70 countries contributed to the growth of scientific studies. Turkey was ranked first with a total of 177 publications.  The United States of America (11.059%), Peoples' Republic of China (8.411%), Iran (6.698%), and Spain (6.698%) were the top five countries according to the number of publications. The publications were cited 11118 times (17.32 per item) and the mean of the H-index was 51. The publications published between 2000- 2009 received the highest number of citations and had the highest H indexes. H indexes and citation numbers of publications have decreased since 2010. This is the first report that shows the trends of osteoarticular involvement in brucellosis. In conclusion, financial support for scientific studies in regions where brucellosis is endemic may increase the number of articles to be published in the future from these regions.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Introduction

Brucellosis is a prevalent systemic zoonotic disease that causes a variety of clinical symptoms all around the globe (Esmaeilnejad-Ganji et al., 2019).  Brucellosis is caused by Brucella spp. bacteria, which are tiny, Gram-negative coccobacilli and mainly spread through the bloodstream (Özlü, 2021). It is transmitted to humans by contact with the meat, milk, fetal tissues, urine, and other body fluids of infected animals through the skin, respiratory, mucous membranes, and conjunctival routes (Arkun & Mete, 2011). The disease was first identified in the Mediterranean basin, giving it the name "Malta fever" (Papathanassiou et al., 1972). Brucella bacteria are Gram-negative, non-motile, and spore-forming coccobacilli that live inside cells. B. melitensis primarily infects small ruminants, B. abortus big ruminants and wildlife, B. suis infects pigs, and B. canis infects dogs; nevertheless, infections in non-preferred hosts are possible, and these species may participate as reservoir hosts (Diaz, 2013; Godfroid, 2002; Jamil et al., 2021; Wernery, 2014). The occurrence of brucellosis in humans indicates a disease burden in animals since humans are dead-end hosts. As a result, controlling the disease in animals is the most cost-effective way to combat brucellosis in humans (Hull & Schumaker, 2018).

Most patients with brucellosis have an undulant fever, sweating, chronic malaise, and musculoskeletal pain hosts (Diaz, 2013; Godfroid, 2002; Jamil et al., 2021; Wernery, 2014). Osteoarticular involvement is the most common brucellosis involvement, affecting 10-85% of the brucellosis cases. The most commonly affected joints are the sacroiliac (up to 80%) and spinal (up to 54%) joints. The most common consequences of brucellar spinal involvement are spondylitis and spondylodiscitis. Other osteoarticular manifestations include peripheral arthritis, osteomyelitis, discitis, bursitis, and tenosynovitis, all of which have a lesser prevalence (Arkun & Mete, 2011; Esmaeilnejad-Ganji et al., 2019; Özlü, 2021; Sanaei Dashti & Karimi, 2013).

In this work, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of the current literature on osteoarticular involvement in brucellosis. The study's overall purpose was to investigate the impact of publications in this field and to discover research development and clusters.

 

Materials and methods

In this bibliometric analysis study, we used the Web of Science (Wos) (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA, USA) database to obtain the data. We used ‘human’ and ‘Brucella’ or ‘brucellosis’  and  ‘spondylitis’ or ‘spondylodiscitis’ or ‘osteoarticular manifestations’ or ‘arthritis’ or ‘osteomyelitis’ or  ‘discitis’ or ‘bursitis’ or ‘tenosynovitis’ as the search terms in WoS  topic (title, abstract, author keywords, and KeyWords Plus).    The titles, document types, publication years, authors, organizations, keywords, abstracts of each record, H-index, and citations within the WOS publications were saved as TXT files and imported into Microsoft Office Excel 2019 (Los Angeles, CA, USA). Data for this investigation were obtained on April 15, 2022. We selected articles and reviewed articles. In publications that do not contain information about the identity of the author, the first and responsible author is the same person. Similarly, publications published by a single institution were categorized as the first author's and corresponding author's institutions. Furthermore, we only considered the corresponding author in articles with numerous corresponding authors. Addresses were used to determine the type of collaboration.

As a timeline, only documents published between the years 1970 and 2021 were analyzed. Since 2022 has not been completed yet, publications from this time period were omitted from the study.

The VOSviewer 1.6.18 for Microsoft Windows systems tool was used to visualize country collaboration networks and keywords. We generated co-occurrence networks using the bibliographic material from the publications we collected (e.g., nations, citations, and keywords).

 

Results

Based on the search method utilized in this study, the findings revealed that 701 documents on this topic were indexed in the Wos database between the years 1970 and 2021. 576 of the documents were articles and 66 review articles. We only analyzed these 642 documents.

83.178% of them were publishedn Science Citation Index Expanded (Sci-Expanded) and 15.576% in Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) indexed journals. English (88.785%), Turkish (5.296%), French (1.713%), Portuguese (1.246%), and Spanish (1.246%) were the mostly preferred languages. Since 2000, the number of articles had not fallen below 10 articles/year. The most significant number of publications was published in 2019 (n = 50) (Figure 1).

Researchers from 70 countries contributed to the growth of scientific studies. Turkey was ranked the first with total of 177 publications.  The United States of America (USA) (11.059%), the Peoples' Republic of China (8.411%), Iran (6.698%), and Spain (6.698%) were the top five countries according to the number of publications (Table 1). Institutions originating from Argentina, USA, Turkey, and Iran were the institutions that produced the most of the publications. The University of Buenos Aires produced the highest number of publications (Table 2). The main research areas were Infectious Diseases, General Internal Medicine, Microbiology, and Rheumatology (Table 3). Most of the funding agencies were from Argentina and the USA (Table 4).

Citing analysis

The publications were cited 11118 times (17.32 per item) and the mean of the H-index was 51.  The number of citations has increased over the years (Figure 2). The publications published between 2000- 2009 received the highest number of citations and had the highest H indexes. The highest number of publications were published between 2010- 2019. H indexes and citation numbers of publications have decreased since 2010 (Table 5).

Mapping analysis

The mapping analysis of the documents were given in Figures 3-5.

Discussion

Bibliometric analysis studies give an insight into the advances in a discipline, and they also offered the details of the most influential publications, institutes, countries, and authors. Although many bibliometric analysis studies have been carried out in the field of medicine recently, similar studies on brucellosis are quite limited (Bakri et al., 2018; Mızrakçı et al., 2021). In addition, no similar study published on osteoarticular involvement of brucellosis, which is the most common involvement of brucellosis, was found in the available literature.

In bibliometric investigations, the WOS database is the most widely used database (Bakri et al., 2018; Şahin, 2022).  We also used the WOS database.

Although it was determined that most of the articles in the field of medicine were published in the USA in previous bibliometric analysis studies (Beshyah and Beshyah, 2019; Köylüoğlu et al, 2021; Küçük et al, 2021; Özlü A, 2021; Öztürk G, 2022), Based on our analysis of the WoS database, Turkey had published the majority of documents since 1970, followed by the USA.

Our findings paint a clear picture of the documents in the history of osteoarticular involvement in brucellosis research. In a study conducted in the Scopus database, the publications on brucellosis were examined. It was determined that most of the publications were from the USA (Mızrakçı et al., 2021). In a similar study (Bakri et al., 2018) the researchers evaluated the most cited articles on brucellosis and they used two databases (both Scopus and WOS databases). We used the WOS database for our research and we found that many countries, including American, European, Asian, and Mediterranean countries, contributed to this research, with the highest contribution from Turkey. This situation can be attributed to the fact that the disease is endemic in Turkey and in these countries (Papathanassiou et al., 1972).

A bibliometric analysis is an efficient method of calculating the overall trend of research activity and elucidating the relationships between relevant research institutions, countries, or authors. Bibliometrics may also assess the number and evolution of scientific outputs across countries and years in important scientific disciplines, which is especially useful for novel disciplines whose implications on the larger field of medical research have yet to be thoroughly assessed (Beshyah & Beshyah, 2019; Köylüoğlu et al., 2021; Küçük et al., 2021; Özlü, 2021; Öztürk, 2022; Şahin, 2022). In our study, the current status of countries was given in Figure3 and Figure 5.

The H index has been identified as a reliable means of predicting future research, and it incorporates the number of times a specific country's publications are time-cited relative to the number of times those publications are at least co-cited (Zhao et al., 2018). In this current study VOSviewer was used to determine the consequence, the number of co-cited contributors, and frequency of co-cited connections. And also the H index of each top productive country was given in Table 1. In the examination of the organizations that provide funding for the publications, it was seen that the organizations of Argentine origin took place at the top of the list. However, the number of publications originating from Argentina was still in 8th place in the ranking and was also in 4th place in terms of the H index.

Conclusion

To detect the subject progression and trends in this domain's intellectual landscape, we created a series of scientific maps of countries, institutions, authors, co-cited references, and citation burst keywords. Turkey seemed to have a significant effect on this subject. Argentina has been discovered to be specifically interested in this topic. Publications published between 2000 and 2009 received the most citation and had the highest H indexes. Most publications were published between 2010- 2019. Since 2010, H indexes and publication citation numbers have decreased. Also, the number of publications has decreased in the last 2 years. This may be because the COVID 19 pandemic, which has affected the whole world, has attracted scientific attention.

Limitations

Only documents in the WOS database were included in the study. The last point is important here because brucellosis was discovered in 1887 and it is possible that some important studies are not indexed in the current database. Because in the current database, the period before 1970 cannot be evaluated. Furthermore, we believe that searching more than one database will uncover additional publications.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest statement.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Arkun R. & Mete B.D. Musculoskeletal brucellosis. Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology, 2011, 15(5), 470–9.
Bakri F.G., AlQadiri H.M. & Adwan M.H. The Highest Cited Papers in Brucellosis: Identification Using Two Databases and Review of the Papers' Major Findings. BioMedical Research International, 2018,2018,9291326.
Beshyah W.S. & Beshyah S.A. Bibliometric analysis of the literature on Ramadan fasting and diabetes in the past three decades (1989-2018). Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 2019, 151, 313-22.
Díaz Aparicio E. Epidemiology of brucellosis in domestic animals caused by Brucella melitensis, Brucella suis and Brucella abortus. Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics), 2013, 32(1), 43–60.
Esmaeilnejad-Ganji, S.M. & Esmaeilnejad-Ganji S. Osteoarticular manifestations of human brucellosis: A review. World Journal of Orthopedics, 2019, 10(2), 54–62.
Godfroid J. Brucellosis in wildlife. Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics), 2002, 21(2), 277–86.
Hull N. C. & Schumaker B. A. Comparisons of brucellosis between human and veterinary medicine. Infection Ecology & Epidemiology,2018,8(1),1500846.
Jamil T., Khan A. U., Saqib M., Hussain M. H., Melzer F., Rehman A., et al. Animal and Human Brucellosis in Pakistan. Frontiers in public health, 2021, 9, 660508.
Köylüoğlu A.N., Aydın B., Özlü C. Bibliometric evaluation based on scopus database: Global analysis of publications on diabetic retinopathy and comparison with publications from Turkey. Demiroglu Science University Florence Nightingale Journal of Medicine, 2021, 7(3), 268-75.
Küçük U., Alkan S., Uyar C. Bibliometric analysis of infective endocarditis. Iberoamerican Journal of Medicine, 2021, 3(4), 350-5.
Mızrakçı S., Dindar Demiray E.K., Öntürk Akyüz H. Bruselloz Konulu Yayınların Global Analizi ve Türkiye’den Yapılan Yayınlarla Karşılaştırılması. Journal of Biotechnology and Strategic Health Research, 2021, 5(3), 229-35.
Mızrakçı S. Rotavirus Konulu Yayınlara Global Bakış. Black Sea Journal of Health Science, 2022, 5(2), 239-44.
Özlü A. Brucellosis: A perspective from physical therapy and rehabilitation specialist. Demiroglu Science University Florence Nightingale Journal of Medicine, 2021, 7(3), 323-6.
Özlü A. Miyofisal Ağrı Sendromu Konulu Yayınların Analizi. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal Health Sciences, 2021, 7(3), 65-78.
Öztürk G. Toraks Cerrahisi Konusundaki Yayınların Global Analizi ve Türkiye'nin Katkısı. TOGÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 2022, 2(1), 39-50.
Papathanassiou B. T., Papachristou G. & Hartofilakidis-Garofalidi. Brucellar spondylitis. Report of 6 cases. Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1972, 43(5), 384–91.
Sanaei Dashti A. & Karimi A. Skeletal Involvement of Brucella melitensis in Children: A Systematic Review. Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences, 2013, 38(4), 286-92.
Wernery U. Camelid brucellosis: a review. Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics), 2014, 33(3), 839–57.
Young EJ. Brucellosis. In: Feigin RD, Cherry JD, Demmler GJ, Kaplan SL, editors. Textbook of pediatric infectious diseases. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2004, 1852-88.
Zhao D., Li J., Seehus C., Huang X., Zhao M., Zhang S., et al. Bibliometric analysis of recent sodium channel research. Channels (Austin), 2018, 12(1), 311-25.